• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Savannah River Site

Monitors a host of energy and nuclear issues from a public interest perspective

  • Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • SRS Watch News
  • Library
    • Department of Energy
    • General Documents
    • Freedom of Information Act Documents
  • Photos
  • Show Search
Hide Search

DOE Stumbles as it Presents German Spent Fuel Dumping Scheme

SRSW · June 4, 2014 ·

U.S. DOE Releases Details of Environmental Meeting on June 24 on Import to Savannah River Site of German High-Level Nuclear Waste and Wrongly Claims there would be a Plan for its “Disposition”

Unprecedented Import of Commercial Spent Fuel, via Charleston, South Carolina, for Dumping at SRS May Violate International Norms Related to Nuclear Waste Management

Federal Register Notice of June 4: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-06-04/pdf/2014-12933.pdf

Columbia, SC – The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has moved a step closer to what is believed to be the first import into the United States from a foreign country of highly radioactive commercial spent nuclear fuel.  As there is no disposition path in the United States for such highly radioactive nuclear waste, there is concern that DOE is complicit in Germany’s plan to dump a daunting nuclear waste problem on the U.S.

DOE has today provided more details in a Federal Register notice about a June 24 meeting to be held near the 310-square mile Savannah River Site (SRS) on the proposed import of the hard-to-manage commercial spent fuel from Germany.  DOE proposes to import 455 large storage casks of the unusual highly radioactive waste, which poses a management challenge in either Germany or the United States, over a period of three years via the port at Joint Base Charleston in Charleston, South Carolina.

According to Savannah River Site Watch, a public interest group located near SRS, the planned import of commercial spent fuel may well be a violation of both the international “Convention on Nuclear Safety,” signed in 1994, and ratified by both Germany and the United States as well as the “Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management,” also ratified by both countries.  The two countries must explain how the proposed shipment of the commercial spent fuel to the US does not violate the conventions establishing international safety and management norms.  The 5th Review Meeting of the Joint Convention will take place beginning on May 11, 2015.

The Federal Register notice states that an “environmental assessment” (EA) would be prepared to “analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to accept, process, and disposition” of the import of spent fuel, in the unusual form of graphite spheres contained uranium and thorium, from the AVR and THTR-300 experimental gas-cooled reactors.

“While DOE is presenting the import of this spent fuel as step being taken for nuclear non-proliferation reasons, it is becoming clearer that the main driver is the lack of will by Germany to properly address its own nuclear waste problem,” said Tom Clements, director Savannah River Site Watch. “While some at SRS are eyeing the large sum of money that could be made on processing the spent fuel at SRS, Germany is obligated to implement the best practices in managing its own highly radioactive commercial spent fuel and that does not include dumping their problem on the Savannah River Site.”

According to SRS Watch, given a halt to plans to develop a a high-level waste repository in the United States and no final disposal facility at SRS, the notice is erroneous as there is no disposition plan for this waste nor any other high-level waste now at SRS.  The only option for the waste, even if processed, would be long-term storage in one problematic form or another.  “DOE is totally erroneous is presenting that a disposition path exists in the U.S. as such is clearly not the case,” said Clements.  “DOE must clarify that there is no known disposition path in the U.S. for the German commercial nuclear waste being considered for import.”

The notice states that an environmental meeting on the proposal will be held on Tuesday, June 24, 2014, from6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the North Augusta Community Center, 495 Brookside Drive, North Augusta, South Carolina 29841.  The notice also includes information as to where written comments can be sent.

SRS Watch encourages the public to attend the “scoping meeting” and make comments on both the proposed import of the German waste and also the trend of SRS to accept foreign nuclear waste and plutonium.

SRS Watch is aware that the total number of irradiated graphite spheres (the size of a billiard ball) is 290,000 for the AVR fuel and 605,000 for the THTR fuel.  Both reactors were experimental commercial facilities, not research reactors.  The issue of export to the U.S. has only come up in the last few years given lack of German will to manage the problematic gas reactor spent fuel.

The highly radioactive material from them is now stored in 30-tonne CASTOR casks at the two sites and is described in the Federal Register notice:

“The EA will to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to accept, process, and disposition used nuclear fuel from Germany containing approximately 900 kilograms (kg) of HEU from the United States. The used nuclear fuel is composed of kernels containing thorium and U.S.-origin HEU embedded in thousands of small graphite spheres. The United States provided the HEU to Germany between 1965 and 1988. The fuel was irradiated at the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Versuchsreaktor (AVR) reactor, which operated from 1967 to 1988, and the Thorium High Temperature Reactor (THTR)-300, which operated from 1983 to 1989. These reactors operated as part of Germany’s program to research and develop pebble bed reactor technology. AVR reactor fuel is stored at Juelich, Germany, and the THTR–300 reactor fuel is stored at Ahaus, Germany.”  Due to irradiation and radioactive decay, it is unknown how much HEU remains in the spent fuel.  [The German word “versuchs” means “experimental.”]

The notice mentions three possible ways to manage and process the spent fuel but as no final disposition path exists it would stay at SRS, raising public concern about the proposal and larger issue of importation of nuclear waste and foreign plutonium to SRS.  It appears that DOE may be attempting to keep the import of the spent fuel in its domain without involvement of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the U.S. licensing agency for commercial nuclear waste import. This will be raised at the June 24 meeting by SRS Watch.

“The NRC may well have a licensing role for this commercial venture if DOE decides to pursue it,” said Clements.  “DOE must fully explain how this proposal is not simply a commercial waste management operation disguised as nuclear non-proliferation and so far they have fallen far short of an adequate explanation.”

Concerning transportation, today’s notice states “Under the proposed action, the German government would work with DOE to transport the used fuel by oceangoing vessel to the United States in DOE/U.S. Department of Transportation-certified Type B casks.  The used fuel would be received at Joint Base Charleston in Charleston, South Carolina, and then the casks would be transported by rail to SRS. DOE estimates that this could involve approximately 455 casks received over a period of approximately 3 years.”

Notes:
1. Federal Register notice, June 4, “Environmental Assessment for the Acceptance and Disposition of Used Nuclear Fuel Containing U.S.-Origin Highly Enriched Uranium From the Federal Republic of Germany”

text:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-06-04/html/2014-12933.htm

pdf:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-06-04/pdf/2014-12933.pdf

2. “Statement of Intent” between The U.S. Department of Energy & two German government entities, signed on March 28/April 1, 2014:

https://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/statement_of_intent_march_april_2014.pdf

3. Kein Export von Jülicher Atommüll nach South Carolina – SRS Watch statement against proposed export of spent fuel from Germany to the Savannah River Site, March 8, 2014 at Fukushima event in
Jülich, Germany,

http://www.westcastor.de/srs.htm

4. SRS Watch news release, May 30 – with links to key documents in “notes”:

https://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/savannah_river_site_watch_news_german_waste_sr_may_30_2014.pdf

Department of Energy to Analyze Import of Highly Radioactive German Spent Fuel from Experimental Gas-Cooled Reactors, with Savannah River Site in South Carolina as a Destination

Dumping of Waste from Juelich, Ahaus on SRS to be Opposed:  Waste is in 457 30-tonne CASTOR Casks Holding 895,000 Graphite Balls

5. Convention on Nuclear Safety:

http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf449.shtml

6. Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/1997/infcirc546.pdf

http://www-ns.iaea.org/conventions/waste-jointconvention.asp

Filed Under: SRS Watch News

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Updates via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • Workshop on Plutonium Pit Production PEIS & New Nuclear Weapons: May 22, 2025
  • News Flash! Lawsuit Compels Nationwide Public Review of Plutonium Bomb Core Production by DOE’s NNSA, May 9, 2025 Federal Register
  • Talk on SRS, the Nuclear Arms Race & Upcoming Meetings on Plutonium “Pit” Production – May 10, Columbia, SC & livestream archived
  • SRS & Growing Nuclear Weapons Role: Talks April 28 (Aiken, SC) – with linked presentation – and May 10 (Columbia, SC)
  • Excellent article on NNSA’s scheme to make new plutonium pits: “DOGE’s staff firing fiasco at the nuclear weapon agency means everything but efficiency,” April 16, 2025, Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

Categories

  • Events
  • Latest News
  • SRS Watch News

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014

SAVANNAH RIVER SITE WATCH
1112 Florence Street, COLUMBIA, SC 29201  | 803-834-3084  – srswatch@gmail.com

Footer

The information produced on this website is the sole property of SRS Watch unless otherwise noted and may be reproduced or quoted if credit is given to SRS Watch. Materials published on this website are for non-profit public interest purposes only. SRS Watch is a registered corporation in South Carolina and in December 2014 and has obtained non-profit 501(c)(3) public -interest organization status from the IRS. SRS Watch is responsible for all material published on this website. We strive to be accurate in all material produced. For inquiries, comments or corrections, please contact us at srswatch@gmail.com or 803-834-3084. Donations are most welcome and are tax deductible. Mailing address: Savannah River Site Watch, 1112 Florence Street, Columbia, SC 29201. This site or product includes IP2Location LITE data available from https://lite.ip2location.com.

©SRS Watch 2019  All Rights Reserved in All Media.