January 30, 2019:
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
(REQUEST FOR RULING BY JANUARY 31, 2019)
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A STATUS HEARING
In above court ruling, we note that DOE clarified that the plutonium being shipped is not in the form of pits – see page 12, footnote 13: “The Government’s response represented that the plutonium would be in the form of “pits” (ECF No. 27 at 9, 20–21), however, the Government filed an erratum to correct its response and to clarify that the plutonium “is not in pit form.” (ECF No. 41 at 2.)”
Nevada federal district court ruling, January 31, 2019: “MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/31/2019.Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order pending the Court’s decision its motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 60 ) is denied as moot in light of the Court’s ruling on the latter motion (ECF No. 62 ). The parties are directed to confer on Plaintiff’s motion for a status conference (ECF No. 61 ) and file a report with the Court as to the need for the conference as well as proposed dates.
(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF – PAV) (Entered: 01/31/2019)”
Two more filings with the Nevada court – NNSA answers to State of NV complaint, Feb. 2, 2019 and State of NV appeal to court’s denial of preliminary injunction, Feb. 4, 2019
—–
Ooopps, there goes any hope of a deceptive DOE convincing the State of Nevada to accept a commercial spent fuel dump at Yucca Mountain?