• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Savannah River Site

Monitors a host of energy and nuclear issues from a public interest perspective

  • Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • SRS Watch News
  • Library
    • Department of Energy
    • General Documents
    • Freedom of Information Act Documents
  • Photos
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Thoughts on Touring the $30-Billion SRS Plutonium Bomb Plant…not as Sweet as Willy Wonka’s Chocolate Factory, April 21, 2026

SRSW · April 22, 2026 ·

Thoughts & Observations about South Carolina’s Nuclear Weapons Factory of Doom:

Inside the $30-Billion SRS Plutonium Bomb Factory —

Tom Clements, Savannah River Site Watch (www.srswatch.org), Columbia, SC, on April 21, 2026 Tour

As part of the lawsuit in which we won the Programmatic EIS, the court-approved “settlement agreement” stipulated that we could have a sit-down meeting and tour the pit-plant building at the DOE’s Savannah River Site (SRS). We received the allowed meeting and tour by gracious but reluctant National Nuclear Security Administration and contractor hosts on April 21. Informed and engaged citizens thus crossed into a gold-plated realm of nuclear weapons production that few get a first-hand glimpse of.

According to the settlement agreement of January 16, 2025:

The Parties further agree that at each annual meeting, upon Plaintiffs’ request, Plaintiffs will receive a tour of the building currently known as the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility (“MOX”)—that will become the Main Processing Building. The Parties’ agreement about annual tours is subject to this limitation:

a. Once the MOX/Main Processing Building becomes classified—as determined by the relevant government agencies, including DOE and NNSA—Plaintiffs, who do not have the requisite security clearances to observe a classified space, can no longer enter the MOX/Main Processing Building. i. If the MOX/Main Processing Building becomes classified, site counsel for Savannah River will provide declarations every six months that explain whether DOE/NNSA’s activities occurring in the MOX/Main Processing Building are in compliance with this Settlement Agreement in lieu of the annual tour.

We were told that the 2nd & 3rd floors were off limits as openings were being cut through the thick concrete walls with a water jet high-pressure blaster and the air had silica in it, which required protective equipment. But we can’t say for sure what’s on those floors as we weren’t allowed on them.

We toured part of the first floor and could see the vast size of the building and how complicated it will be to put the pit-production facility into a 500-room building designated for another use. We could see where openings were cut in the thick concrete walls, which appeared to be about to be about a foot thick, with rebar reinforcement. Walls offering more protection appears to be near 18 inches thick. The water blaster can remove the concrete but the internal rebar, which we saw, has to be cut away with other methods.

We could see where the white wall covering – some kind of protective, easily cleanable material – had been removed from the entire facility except on metal “embeds” where attachment could be affixed in the future. Another such coating will be applied.

We could see that all MOX equipment, such as gloveboxes, and HVAC duct work and pipes and wiring had been removed from the MOX plant and scrapped as DOE reported last year. No telling how many millions of dollars were wasted in removing what took years to place in the MOX plant. NNSA hasn’t revealed that financial loss nor has Congress investigated it. Construction of the infamous MOX facility, now being morphed into a nuclear bomb factory, started in 2007 and was essentially ended in 2017, again with no investigations.

The size of the building, height of the ceilings, haphazard-appearing nature of room location, the thickness of the walls, the vast space to be filled left me pondering the huge amount of equipment that must be squeezed into the building. I could only think of trying to force the proverbial round stake into a square hole. This I going to be a tough job. I expect continuous delays, cost overruns and technical challenges, a la the MOX debacle. NNSA will sugar coat the situation at every turn and caution in what they say about such a bomb plant is called for. Workers and contractors will fight for the huge amount of funding. But can wasting $30 billion on construction alone be sugar coated? This is not money needed for essential work at SRS – cleaning up high-level nuclear waste left over from the Cold War.

From what we saw, I think we could attest that no classified equipment had been installed. That can only come after the conclusion of the Programmatic EIS and issuance of a “Record Decision” (ROD) in favor of a “preferred alternative,” meaning production of up to 205 plutonium pits per year at SRS the Los Alamos National Lab. In fact, almost no equipment has been installed in the rather bare facility.

We were taken to the roof and looked out in each direction and were told what facilities would be located around the building, such as a waste storage building and entry buildings. We could see where a giant “sand filter,” though which all air from the facility would be passed, was under construction.

They claimed that the 90%-complete design would be finished in September. That the MOX project was started with a design far lower than that may have sealed its fate from the start. The poor Performance Evaluation Report (PER) for Fiscal Year 2025 looked very similar to the disastrous reports for the MOX plant well before it was on its final legs, which NNSA couldn’t deny. And the real, complicated construction at the pit plant hasn’t even started.

All during the tour I could only think, this project will end up costing $30 billion, or more. And for what? Why the rush to turn an abandoned building into a facility to continue the threat of nuclear annihilation? While the base rate of pit production at the SRS facility being 50 pits per year (for new-design weapons), it is also being analyzed to produce 125 pits per year. For what? Not deterrence, as that rate is far from any amount of weapons someone might be claimed is a deterrent force. Those pits aren’t needed for existing weapons. Rather it’s a number that could support rapid and dangerous armament with a vast number of nuclear weapons. On the tour of the nuclear bomb factory, I kept shaking my head to myself – I was inside the heart of a new nuclear arms race that could undermine my country’s security was mindlessly taking shape and at a massive and unaffordable financial cost that is robbing money from the very real needs we are collectively facing. Better build a South Carolina Chocolate Factory for the children to enjoy and spend the money more wisely.

—–

Bomb-plant ponderings posted here:  talk about SRS pit plant tour for April 22 2026 briefing

Group news release for April 22, 2026 briefing at the South Carolina state house, about the pit plant tour and overall pit-production issue:  SRS Pit Plant tour press release 4-21-26

Filed Under: SRS Watch News

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Updates via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • Thoughts on Touring the $30-Billion SRS Plutonium Bomb Plant…not as Sweet as Willy Wonka’s Chocolate Factory, April 21, 2026
  • “Impacts of plutonium pit production at Savannah River Site unveiled” – article on Plutonium Pit Plant PEIS, April 20, 2026
  • Comment to DOE on Impacts of SRS Plutonium Bomb Plant; Update on Bomb Plant Tour at SC State Capitol on April 22
  • MOX-Style Disaster Unleashed? NNSA Gives Failing Grade to Construction of SRS Plutonium Bomb Plant by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions
  • SRS Watch Unleashes Comment Against DOE Effort to Avoid NEPA for “Advanced Nuclear Reactors,” March 4, 2026

Categories

  • Events
  • Latest News
  • SRS Watch News

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014

SAVANNAH RIVER SITE WATCH
1112 Florence Street, COLUMBIA, SC 29201  | 803-834-3084  – srswatch@gmail.com

Footer

The information produced on this website is the sole property of SRS Watch unless otherwise noted and may be reproduced or quoted if credit is given to SRS Watch. Materials published on this website are for non-profit public interest purposes only. SRS Watch is a registered corporation in South Carolina and in December 2014 and has obtained non-profit 501(c)(3) public -interest organization status from the IRS. SRS Watch is responsible for all material published on this website. We strive to be accurate in all material produced. For inquiries, comments or corrections, please contact us at srswatch@gmail.com or 803-834-3084. Donations are most welcome and are tax deductible. Mailing address: Savannah River Site Watch, 1112 Florence Street, Columbia, SC 29201. This site or product includes IP2Location LITE data available from https://lite.ip2location.com.

©SRS Watch 2019  All Rights Reserved in All Media.